SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 70242

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
Uppari Yadaiah – Appellant
Versus
K. Ramu – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

JUDGMENT:

The appellant/claimant filed the present appeal against the order passed by the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal-cum-VII Additional District Judge, Miryalguda, (hereinafter referred to ‘learned Tribunal’) in M.V.O.P.No.62 of 2014, dated 29.06.2019, wherein claimant/ petitioner had filed the claim petition under Section 166 of M.V.Act seeking compensation of Rs.6,00,000/- for the injuries received in a motor vehicle accident that took place on 17.11.2010.

2. The brief facts of the case are that appellant/claimant filed M.V.O.P.No.62 of 2014 under Section 166 of the M.V.Act, 1988 seeking compensation for the injuries received in a motor vehicle accident alleged to have caused due to rash and negligent manner by the driver of the lorry. It is contended that on 17.11.2010, the petitioner who was a cleaner to the lorry was sitting in the cabin and when the lorry reached the outskirts of Dubba Thanda Matoor Village, the petitioner tried to push the electrical wires coming across the lorry, with the help of a stick and then, the driver of the lorry drove the lorry in rash and negligent manner as a result he slipped and fell down from the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top