SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 70300

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA
Smt.Bollam Nagamani – Appellant
Versus
Sri.G.Jayendra Babu – Respondent


HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE TIRUMALA DEVI EADA CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL NOs.196 AND 199 OF 2019

COMMON JUDGMENT:

These two appeals are filed aggrieved by the common judgment and decree dated 25.01.2019 passed in O.S.No.340 of 2007 and O.S.No.606 of 2011 by the learned XI Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as ‘the trial Court’).

2. For convenience and clarity, the parties herein are referred to as they were arrayed before the trial Court.

3. The case of the plaintiff/G.Jayender Babu in O.S.No.340 of 2007 before the trial Court is that he was the tenant of the defendant No.1/A.Shankar in premises bearing House No.SRT 377, M.No.1-1-379/226, situated at Industrial Housing Colony, Jawahar Nagar, Chikkadpally, Hyderabad from the year 2000 onwards and that A.Shankar offered a portion of the above said house for sale to the plaintiff. Since the plaintiff was already a tenant he readily agreed to purchase the same, thus, he has entered into an agreement of sale with A.Shankar to purchase the portion of the said premises to an extent of 115 Sq.yards out of the total 215 Sq.yards for a total sale consideration of Rs.16 Lakhs. The plaintiff paid Rs.3 Lakhs tow

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top