SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 70540

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD. – Appellant
Versus
KHAIRUNBEE AND ANOTHER – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA C.M.A.NO.302 OF 2015

JUDGMENT:

This appeal is preferred by the appellant-United India Insurance Company Limited under Section 30 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923 (for short ‘the Act”), against the order, dated 10.03.2015 passed in W.C.No.122 of 2013 by the Commissioner For Employees’ Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour-IV, Hyderabad (herein after referred to as “the Asst. Commissioner of Labour”).

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to herein before the Authority.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the applicant had filed a claim-petition under the provisions of the Act, for the death of her son by name Asif Pasha (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) claiming compensation against the employer of the deceased i.e. owner of the Jeep bearing No.AP 22 U 3599 and also against the insurer of the said Jeep, United Indian Insurance Company Limited, Hyderabad. It is stated that the deceased was an employee as driver under the employment of opposite party No.1. During the course of employment on 26.11.2007, as per the instructions of 1st opposite party the deceased was proceeding on the Jeep be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top