IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
Singampally Raja Rao – Appellant
Versus
Bupathi Paidithalli – Respondent
The Hon’ble Smt. Justice Renuka Yara Second Appeal No.390 of 2025
Judgment:
Heard Sri Amancharla V. Gopala Rao, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri P. Rama Sharabna Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent, on the question of admission. Perused the record.
2. This Second appeal under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code has been filed by the appellants/defendants aggrieved by the impugned judgment and decree dated 23.07.2025 passed by the Principal District Judge, Bhadradri Kothagudem in A.S.No.33 of 2025 confirming the Judgment and decree dated 02.06.2023 passed by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kothagudem in O.S.No.169 of 2015.
3. Initially, suit was filed by the respondent/plaintiff on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Kothagudem seeking declaration of his possessory title and for consequential recovery of possession under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act and for arrears of damages and future damages. The said suit was partly decreed declaring the possessory title of respondent with a direction to the appellants to vacate the suit schedule property within 3 months from the date of judgment. The relief with respect to past and future damages has been dismisse
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.