IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
Smt. Nallagutta Suryakala – Appellant
Versus
Gadila Vasanatha Reddy – Respondent
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
JUDGMENT:
This appeal is filed under Section 96, read with order 41 rule 1 of C.P.C against the judgment and decree passed in OS No.770 of 2008 on the file of the IX Additional District and Session Judge (FTC), Rangareddy District, at LB Nagar.
2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants/plaintiffs herein have filed a suit for partition of the suit schedule property seeking partition of the suit schedule property into five equal shares and to allot of one such share each to the plaintiff Nos.1 and 2 and defendants Nos.1 to 3.
3. The contention of the plaintiffs are that plaintiff Nos.1 and 2 are the daughters, defendants Nos.1 and 2 are the sons and defendant No.3 is the wife of late G.Malla Reddy S/o. Narayan Reddy. Originally, Sri Narayan Reddy who was the grandfather of the plaintiffs and the defendants Nos.1 and 2 along with his brothers was the owner of the land bearings admeasuring 05.29 gts in Sy.No.439 of Gundlapochampally, Ranga Reddy District. It is the case of the plaintiffs that the said Narayan Reddy had orally partitioned the said property and in the said partition, Narayan Reddy had got 1/4th property share i.e.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.