SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 70939

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
Smt. Nallagutta Suryakala – Appellant
Versus
Gadila Vasanatha Reddy – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

JUDGMENT:

This appeal is filed under Section 96, read with order 41 rule 1 of C.P.C against the judgment and decree passed in OS No.770 of 2008 on the file of the IX Additional District and Session Judge (FTC), Rangareddy District, at LB Nagar.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants/plaintiffs herein have filed a suit for partition of the suit schedule property seeking partition of the suit schedule property into five equal shares and to allot of one such share each to the plaintiff Nos.1 and 2 and defendants Nos.1 to 3.

3. The contention of the plaintiffs are that plaintiff Nos.1 and 2 are the daughters, defendants Nos.1 and 2 are the sons and defendant No.3 is the wife of late G.Malla Reddy S/o. Narayan Reddy. Originally, Sri Narayan Reddy who was the grandfather of the plaintiffs and the defendants Nos.1 and 2 along with his brothers was the owner of the land bearings admeasuring 05.29 gts in Sy.No.439 of Gundlapochampally, Ranga Reddy District. It is the case of the plaintiffs that the said Narayan Reddy had orally partitioned the said property and in the said partition, Narayan Reddy had got 1/4th property share i.e.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top