SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 71076

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
Merugu Karunakar – Appellant
Versus
Merugu Sujatha – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N. TUKARAMJI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2430 OF 2025

ORDER

This Revision has been filed challenging the proprietary decree and order dated 13.02.2025 in I.A. No.477 of 2023 in O.S. No.251 of 2022 on the file of Principal Junior Civil Judge-

cum-Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Karimanagar.

2. Heard Mr. Merugu Srinivas, Party-in-person for the petitioners and Mr. Gummalla Bhaskar Reddy, learned Counsel for the respondents.

3. Briefly stated, the relevant facts are that the respondents, as plaintiffs, filed a suit seeking partition of the schedule properties. The revision petitioners/defendants, in turn, filed an interlocutory application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking rejection of the plaint. The Court below, after considering the pleadings, dismissed the application. Aggrieved by this order, the petitioners/defendants preferred the present revision.

4. The petitioners, appearing in person, contend that the trial Court failed to appreciate that the suit is barred by limitation, which squarely falls under clause (d) of Rule 11. They further submit that the suit has been undervalued and that the plaint does not disclose a cause of ac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top