SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 71339

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
Shaik Abdulla – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 26227/2025



THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.26227 OF 2025

ORAL ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.

2. The Petitioners herein are claiming that they are the absolute owners and possessors of land admeasuring Ac.3.21½ guntas in sy.No.84/1, Ac.0.24 guntas in Sy.No.84/1LA5 and Ac.0.12 guntas in Sy.No.84/1GA/2/2 respectively, situated at Dawoodguda, H/o.Pulimamidi Village, Kandukuru Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. In proof of the same, they have filed copies of the gift settlement document, sale deed, pahanis for the year 2004- 05, 2011-12, 2014-15 and 2015-16, pattadar passbooks, title deeds etc. Even then, the subject properties are they have submitted online applications bearing Nos.30T167500005232 and 30T167500006175, dated 20.07.2023 and 13.09.2024 to the 3rd respondent with a request to delete the subject properties from the list of prohibited properties. Despite receiving and acknowledging the said online applications, the 3rd respondent did not act upon the same. Aggrieved by the inaction of the 3rd respondent, the petitioners filed the present writ petition.

3. Whereas, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, would submit that respondent No.3 will consider the said online applications submitted by the petitioners strictly in accordance with law.

4. In the light of the said submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.3 to consider the online applications bearing Nos. 30T167500005232 and 30T167500005232, dated 20.07.2025 and 13.09.2024, submitted by the petitioners with a request to delete the strictly in accordance with law. If respondent No.3 is not inclined to accept the request made by the petitioners, he shall pass orders assigning specific reasons and communicate a copy of the same to the petitioners. He shall complete the entire exercise within sixty (60) working days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

_____________________

K. LAKSHMAN, J

02.09.2025 dv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top