SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 71416

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
Sri Mampakula Dayakar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana and 2 others – Respondent


THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA WRI T PETI TI ON No.16012 OF 2020

ORDER:

Heard Sri G. Subhash, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Education appearing on behalf of the respondent No.1 and Sri D.Ramakrishna, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.2 and 3.

2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under:

“…to issue a Writ or Order or orders or Direction mainly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not paying the pension and retrial benefits to the petitioner and other colleagues even though they were appointed during the year 2001 in the cadre of driver as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, discriminatory and contrary to Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to regularize his service, pay pension and retrial benefits to the petitioner after his retirement duly considering their representations dated 16.06.2016, 03.03.2016, 12.12.2017, 09.05.2017, 09.08.2016, 27.06.2015, 25.07.2015 and 14.03.2014. The respondent No.3 sent proposals to the respondent No.1 and

2 on 16.06.2016 and 23.02.2019 respectively and pass…”

3. The case of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top