SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 71428

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
M/s. V. K.A CONSTRUCTIONS – Appellant
Versus
Greater Hyderabad Municipal corporation – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA

COMMON ORDER:

Heard Sri S.Veda Vidyanath Reddy, learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned standing counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Perused the record.

2. The C.R.P. No. 2888 of 2024 is filed aggrieved by the impugned order dated 12.08.2024 passed in I.A. No.1211 of 2024 in O.S. No. 419 of 2013 by the learned III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad (for short, ‘the trial Court’), wherein, the petition filed under Order XVIII Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ‘the CPC’) to recall the evidence of D.Ws.1 and 2 for further cross examination, was dismissed.

3. The C.R.P. No. 2889 of 2024 is filed aggrieved by the impugned order dated 12.08.2024 passed in I.A. No. 1210 of 2024 in O.S. No. 419 of 2013 by the learned III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad (for short, ‘the trial Court’), wherein, the petition filed under Order XVIII Rule 17 read with Section 151 of the CPC to reopen the evidence of D.Ws.1 and 2 for further cross examination, was dismissed.

4. The case of the revision petitioner is that D.W.2, who is an official witness,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top