SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 71430

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
Chandra Kiran Kinger – Appellant
Versus
P. Vinod Kumar – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA I.A.No.2 of 2024 in/and CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2842 OF 2024

COMMON ORDER:

This is a Civil Revision Petition filed by the petitioners/plaintiffs aggrieved by the order passed by the learned II Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad (for short ‘the Trial Court’) in I.A.No.684 of 2020 in O.S.No.309 of 2011, dated 18.04.2024, whereby, the petition filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone the delay of 1684 days in filing the petition to set aside the dismissal order dated

28.12.2015 passed in O.S.No.309 of 2011, has been dismissed.

2. Even though, notice has been served on the respondent/defendant, none appeared on his behalf.

3. Heard Sri. Manjiri S. Ganu, learned counsel for the petitioners/plaintiffs.

Facts of the case:

4. The case of the revision petitioners was that petitioner No.1 and his son Rohan Kinger suffered with ill health and were bed ridden, therefore, were frequently travelling for medical treatment to Mumbai and therefore, could not appear before the Court. Further, his counsel did not represent the suit and on account of the same, the suit was dismissed for non-appearance. Since he could not give instruc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top