THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA APPEAL SUIT No.101 of 2019

JUDGMENT:

Heard Sri Manda Adam, learned counsel for the appellant, Sri S.

Venkateswarlu, learned counsel for respondent No.1 and Sri D. Kaval Kumar, learned counsel for respondent Nos.4 to 35. Perused the entire record.

2. This is an appeal preferred by appellant/defendant No.2 aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 20.08.2018 passed by the Special Judge for SC/ST (POA) Act-cum-V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Sangareddy (‘trial Court’), in O.S.No.53 of 2013, wherein the suit filed for partition was preliminarily decreed by partitioning the suit schedule property that is item No.2 of suit schedule A property and schedule B properties into three equal shares and allotting the same to plaintiff/respondent No.1, defendant Nos.1 and 3/respondent Nos.2 and 3 and by partitioning the item No.1 of the suit schedule A property into two equal shares among the plaintiff/respondent No.1 and defendant No.1/respondent No.2.

3. The appellant herein is defendant No.2, respondent No.1 herein is plaintiff, respondent No.2 herein is defendant No.1 and respondent No.3 herein is defendant No.3 before the trial Court. Respondent