SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 71554

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
P. Sreeramulu – Appellant
Versus
Pothraj Manojkumar – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3665 of 2024

ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition arises out of Order, dated

19.09.2024, in I.A.No.840 of 2024 (wrongly typed as I.A.No.840 of 2022) in O.S.No.78 of 2014, on the file of the Court of the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, Medak (for short ‘the Trial Court’), whereby the application, filed by the petitioner under Order 26, Rule 9 of CPC for appointment of Advocate Commissioner to identify the location of the suit schedule property and whether the house of the respondent/defendant is located in the suit survey number or not, was dismissed.

2. Heard Sri J. Teja Varma, learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Sri M.M.Ali, learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the record.

Facts of the case:

3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner/plaintiff filed the suit for declaration and recovery of possession of suit schedule property consisting of land in Sy.No.72/E to an extent of Ac.0.07 Gts., which is illegally occupied by the respondent/defendant and a house is constructed. The respondent denied the survey number and boundaries as shown by the petitioner to the plaint schedule. Therefore, p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top