SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 72112

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
Miryala Prathap Rao – Appellant
Versus
Miryala Mangathara – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2983 of 2025

ORAL ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India in failing to dispose of the pending I.A.No.65 of 2025 in O.S.No.16 of 2025 on the file of the Junior Civil Judge, Khanapur, Nirmal District, contrary to the mandatory provision under Order 39 Rules 2 and 3 of CPC and indiscriminately adjourning the case without disposing the Ad-Interim Injunction Application.

2. Heard Sri C. Hari Preeth, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the trial Court had erred in granting an ex-parte ad-interim injunction against the petitioner on 04.03.2025, and despite the petitioner having filed a counter, failed to dispose of the same in violation of the mandatory provisions under Order 39 Rules 2 and 3 of the CPC. He further submitted that the petitioner is the true owner of the property in question and had already filed O.S.No.26 of 2024 for partition before the same Court, in which the respondent is a party. He contended that the respondent/plaintiff, by suppressing the pendency of the said partition suit, had obtai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top