SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 72298

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
Manda Thirupathi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 24826/2025



THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.24826 of 2025

ORAL ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue.

2. Petitioner is claiming that he is the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac.0.20 guntas in Sy.No.213/C/2 and Ac.0.28 guntas in Sy.No.213/E/2, total land admeasuring Ac.1.0800 guntas, situated at Parlapally Village, Mogullapally Mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District. In proof of the same, he has filed copy of the latest pattadar passbook and title deed. According to the learned ‘Rythu Bandhu’ payments to the petitioner from the years 2018 and 2019 and they are paying the said benefit to respondent Nos.5 and 6. Respondent Nos.5 and 6 names were mutated in the revenue record in respect of the subject property without following the due procedure laid down under law and without putting the petitioner on notice and affording him an opportunity. Therefore, he has submitted an application bearing No.24110070070, dated 18.06.2025 to respondent No.4 with a request to mutate his name and issue e-pattadar passbook in respect of the subject property. He has also submitted a representation dated 22.07.2025 in physical form to respondent No.4 with a similar request. Despite receiving and acknowledging the said representations, respondent No.4 did not act upon the same. Aggrieved by the said inaction of respondent No.4, petitioner filed the present writ petition.

3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, would submit that petitioner is not in possession of the subject property. There are disputes between petitioner and respondent Nos.5 and 6 in respect of the subject property. However, respondent No.4 will consider the said application dated 18.06.2025 submitted by the petitioner during Prajavaani and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law by putting

affording them an opportunity.

4. In the light of the said submission, notice to respondent Nos.5 and 6 is dispensed with. This Writ Petition is disposed of directing respondent No.4 to consider and dispose of the application bearing No.24110070070, dated 18.06.2025 submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with law by putting the petitioner and respondent Nos.5 and 6 on notice and affording them an opportunity. However, he shall complete the said exercise within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, petitioner shall work out his remedies with regard to the disputes between him and respondent Nos.5 and 6 in accordance with law.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

_________________ K. LAKSHMAN, J 21st AUGUST, 2025.

Ynk

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top