SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 72340

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD. HYDERABAD – Appellant
Versus
REHENA BEGUM HYDERABAD AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA C.M.A.NO.284 OF 2015

JUDGMENT:

This appeal is preferred by the appellant-Opposite Party No.2 under Section 30 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923, against the order, dated 18.03.2015 passed in W.C.No.56 of 2013 by the Commissioner For Employees’ Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour-IV, Hyderabad (herein after referred to as “the Authority”).

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties will be referred to as they arrayed before the Authority as the applicants and opposite party Nos.1 and 2.

3. Brief facts of the case are that the applicants have filed an application under the provisions of the Act, 1923 claiming compensation for the death of one Mohd. Abdul Nabi (hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”) claiming compensation against the employer of the deceased i.e. owner of the Car bearing No.P 28 TV 3669 and also against the insurer of the said Car, United India Insurance Company Limited, Hyderabad. It is stated that the deceased was an employee as driver under the employment of opposite party No.1. During the course of employment on 12.03.2013 while he was on duty as a driver of the said Car and he had parked the sai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top