SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 72341

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA
Shaik Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
Mohammed afzal – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

JUDGMENT:

This appeal suit is filed under Section 96, Order XLI Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 by the Appellant/Plaintiff against the judgment and decree passed by the III Additional District Judge, Karimnagar, (hereinafter referred to ‘learned trial court’) in O.S.No.32 of 2006, dated 03.04.2007, wherein the plaintiff filed the said suit for partition of the suit schedule property and the same was dismissed.

Being aggrieved by the dismissal of the suit, the present appeal is filed.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the plaintiff is the son of the second wife of his father and the defendant is the son of first wife. Originally, the plaintiff and the defendant are brothers and sons of one Mr.Nazar Mohammed and they got agricultural land admeasuring Ac.2-30 guntas in Survey No.157, situated at Gunturpali, Bommakal Village. The father of the plaintiff died in the year 1981 and after the death of the father, the plaintiff and the defendant were enjoying the property jointly, though they got half share in each and the mother of the plaintiff and the mother of defendants are different and the father is one and the same.

3. Learne

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top