I N THE HI GH COURT OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WRI T PETI TI ON No.23715 OF 2021 Between Smt. G. Balamma … Petitioner And The State of Telangana & 4 Others … Respondents JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON: 20.08.2025 HON’BLE MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers : Yes may be allowed to see the Judgment?

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be : Yes marked to Law Reporters/Journals?

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to : Yes.

see the fair copy of the Judgment?

____________________________

MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA I N THE HI GH COURT OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WRI T PETI TI ON No.23715 OF 2021 % 20.08.2025 Between:

# Smt. G. Balamma … Petitioner And $ The State of Telangana & 4 Others … Respondents Gist:

> Head Note:

! Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri Ch.Ganesh ^ Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: AGP for Services-I ^ Counsel for Respondent No.5: Sri G. Narender Reddy, learned standing counsel ? Cases Referred:

i)(2020) 1 SCC (L&S)

(ii) 1990(2) SCC Page 396 (iii) 2025 I NSC 144 (iv) 2024 LawSuit(SC) 1209 (v) (2017) 1 SCC 148 (vi) 2010(9) SCC 247 (vii) (2013) 14SCC 65 (viii) 2015 SCC Online SC 1797 (ix) (2015) 8 SCC 265 (x) (2014) 7 SCC 223 (xi) SLP No.32847 of 2024 (xii) AI R 2020 Supreme Court 3969 (xiii) (2006) 4 SCC 1 (xiv) 2011 (1) ALD, Page 234 (xv) 2018(2)ALD page 282 (xvi) 2020(4)ALD page 379 HON’BLE MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA WRI T PETI TI ON No.23715 OF 2021

ORDER:

Heard Sri Ch. Ganesh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj Rural Development, appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4, learned Government Pleader for Finance and planning, appearing on behalf of the respondent No.2 and Sri G. Narender Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for ZPPS AND MPP AND GPPS, appearing on behalf of respondent No.5.

2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under:

“....to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the inaction of the respondents in not regularizing the temporary appointment provided to the petitioner on compassionate grounds in the year 1984 to till date by paying starving wages of Rs.4000/- per month from 37 long years ignoring legitimate wages payable to the petitioner as per Section 13 and 15 of Minimum Wages act, 1948 and Section 4 of Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 r/w Article 14, 16, 21, 39 (d), 43 & 300 (A) of Constitution of India, as highly illegal, unjust, unfair and violation of the provisions of the said Acts and Constitution of India prays to direct the respondents herein to treat the petitioner as a regular one in the last grade post by applying the principle laid by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in C.A. No.6798 of 2019 dated 02.09.2019 in the case of Prem Singh Vs. State of U.P. (2019 (1) SCC 516) and with further direction to release all the consequential monetary benefits of the last grade post w.e.f. 12.04.1991 to till date from time to time with 100% compensation on arrears of pay as per the principle laid by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in C.a. No. 3416 – 3445 of 2010 dated 19.02.2019 in the case of Union of India Vs. Avatar Chand (2019 e ALD SC 32) by awarding heavy cost and pass such order or order, as the Court may deem fit and property in the interest of justice”.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner placing reliance on the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the present writ petition pertaining in particular, to the services rendered by petitioner with the respondents herein for more than a decade contends that the petitioner is entitled for the relief as prayed for in the present writ petition.

PERUSED THE RECORD:-

DI SCUSSI ON AND CONCLUSI ON:-

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the subject issue in the present case is squarely covered by the order of this Court, dated 08.09.2010 passed in W.P.No.24377 of 2007 reported in 2011(1) ALD, Page 234 as confirmed in W.A.No.782 of 2010, d