IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
B.Bharathamma – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION Nos.20036 and 21029 of 2013
COMMON ORDER:
In view of commonality of the issue involved in both the writ petitions, they are analogously heard and taken up for disposal by way of this Common Order. For reference and discussion, the facts in W.P.No.20036 of 2013 are taken.
2. The case of the petitioners, precisely, as per the writ affidavit, is that they are educationally qualified and eligible for appointment as Anganwadi workers, and Supervisors Grade-II; and the respondent- Government has conducted due selection process, and selected the petitioners for appointment. However, due to the ban imposed at the relevant time for appointments, the petitioners were appointed on contract basis through an agency, namely RK4CES Agency, on contract basis. The material papers filed with the writ petition would show that one Indiramma was appointed way back in the year 1985; and the petitioners have put in service ranging between 6 to 15 years as on the date of filing the writ petition in 2013. While so, the respondent- Government issued a Notification No.228/2013 dated 02.07.2013 for recruitment of Supervisors Grade-II, by providing 15% weig
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.