HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION Nos. 10625 AND 14319 OF 2025

COMMON ORDER

The lis involved in both the writ petitions and the parties are one and the same. Therefore, both the writ petitions were heard together and decided by way of this common order.

2. Heard Dr. Donthi Reddy Venkat Reddy, learned Senior Counsel appearing for RVR Associates, learned counsel for petitioners in both the writ petitions, Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3, Sri P. Shanker Rao Patil, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4 in both the writ petitions and Ms. Muskan Joshi, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.5 in W.P.No.10625 of 2025.

3. The petitioners and 4^th respondent in both the writ petitions are own sisters. They are daughters of late B.Narasimha Reddy. Father of the petitioners and 4^th respondent is the absolute owner and possessor of the land admeasuring Ac.2.57 guntas in Sy.Nos.447, 374, 375, 376 and 377 situated at Gummadidala Village, Jinnaram Mandal, Narsapur Taluk, Sanga Reddy District (for short, ‘the subject property’). He is also owner of the land to an extent Ac.0.15guntas in Sy.No.447 situated in the very same village. According to the petitioners, their father has executed a registered gift deed bearing document No.7 of 1988, dated 04.01.1988 in respect of the subject property. He has bequeathed the land admeasuring Ac.0.15 guntas in Sy.No.447 of Gummadidala Village equally between the petitioners by way of executing will deed dated 27.03.1989. Thus, according to the petitioners, they are absolute owners and possessors of the Ac.0.0750 guntas each in Sy.No.447 of Gummadidala Village on the strength of the said will deed dated 27.03.1989. Their names were also mutated and also reflected in the revenue records till

2022-2023.

4. It is further contended by the petitioners that 4^th respondent, their sister, started claiming right over the aforesaid properties. Basing on the alleged unregistered partnership deed dated 02.04.1976, the petitioners filed a suit O.S.No.27 of 1999 against 4^th respondent, their sister, and Mandal Revenue Officer, Jinnaram Mandal, seeking declaration of title and recovery of possession. The same was decreed on 25.07.2006.

5. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the said judgment and decree, 4^th respondent preferred an appeal vide A.S.No.12 of 2006. Vide judgment dated 14.09.2007, the appellate Court dismissed the said appeal. 4^th respondent has preferred S.A.No.24 of 2008. Vide judgment dated 30.03.2022, this Court allowed the said Second Appeal in part, and set aside the finding of both the Courts below of treating Ex.A.12 as will deed. Consequently, suit is partly dismissed to the extent of schedule-B property.

6. It is also apt to note that the suit schedule - B property is Ac.0.15guntas in Sy.No.447 situated at Gummadidala Village. It is also apt to note that the petitioners did not file any SLP challenging the said order dated 30.03.2022 contending that their counsel appeared in S.A.No.24 of 2008 before this Court died without handing over the case bundle including the lower Court record to the petitioners. Even they have also missed their original documents. Therefore, they have submitted representations to the Hon’ble the Chief Justice and also Registrar (Vigilance) of this Court with regard to missing of the said bundle. For the said reasons, they could not prefer any SLP. Thus, judgment dated

30.03.2022 in S.A.No.24 of 2008 has attained finality.

7. On the strength of the said judgment dated 30.03.2022 in S.A.No.24 of 2008, 4^th respondent approached 2^nd respondent with a request to mutate her name in revenue record by way of submitting online application vide ID No.2300165935 on 27.02.2023. 2^nd respondent has considered the said online application and deleted the names of the petitioners from Dharani portal in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.0.15guntas in Sy.No.447 situated at Gummadidala Village.

8. The peti