SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 73114

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
Vutukuru Suneethamma – Appellant
Versus
Surampally Venkayamma – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE RENUKA YARA APPEAL SUIT No.39 of 2019

JUDGMENT:

Aggrieved by the judgment and decree of the learned VII Additional District Judge, Khammam (for short ‘the learned Judge’) in O.S.No.128 of 2017 (O.S.No.291 of 2011 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Khammam) dated 24.12.2018, the appellant/plaintiff filed the present appeal seeking partition and separate possession of her 1/5th share in the suit schedule property.

2. Heard Sri S. Srinivas Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant/plaintiff and Sri Shaik Abdul Kalam Riyaz, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Sri S.A.Razak, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3/defendant Nos.1 to 3.

Facts of the case:

3. The appellant/plaintiff filed suit for partition and separate possession of suit schedule Item No.1 and Item No.2 properties consisting of irrigated dry land to an extent of Ac.10.20 Gts. in Sy.No.270/A and Ac.12.24 Gts. in Sy.No.360 of Konijerla Village and Mandal, Khammam District, within the boundaries detailed in the plaint schedule. The respondents/defendants are the mother (respondent No.1), brother (respondent No.2) and sisters (respondent Nos.3 and 4). The appellant is the daughter of respondent No.1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top