SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 73160

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
Syed All Qasimlmmad – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 23542/2025



THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.23542 of 2025

ORDER:

Heard Mr. Uzair Ahmed Khan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.Vigneswar Reddy, learned Government Pleader for Transport appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 3. With their consent, this writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission itself.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition is filed declaring the action of the respondent No.3-the Regional Transport Authority in not considering the application of the petitioner for registration of his four wheeler vehicle viz., Mahindra Thar Roxx AX7L D AT RWD (BSVI-PH2), Engine No.KYS4F66551 and Chassis No.MA1UN2KY7S2F47527 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the Telangana Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1963 and rules made thereunder and also contrary to the orders passed by this Court consequently direct the respondents to complete the permanent registration of the Petitioner’s vehicle (Engine No.KYS4F66551 and Chassis No.MA1UN2KY7S2F47527) with registration number TG-08-AE-0244 without insisting on any further tax or penalty i.e., beyond 18 percent of the ex-showroom price of subject vehicle and also direct the respondents to waive the requirement to re-pay the Rs.1,765/- slot booking fee paid on 06-08-2025.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the issue involved in this matter is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in Rohit Nayani v. State of Telangana and Ors1 and requested this Court to pass similar order in this matter also.

4. Learned Government Pleader for Transport appearing for the official respondents did not dispute the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner with regard to the orders of this Court in Rohit Nayani v. State of Telangana and Ors (supra) and requested to pass appropriate orders.

5. In view of the aforesaid submissions made on either side, this writ petition is disposed of directing the

1 2020 SCC ONLINE TS 1687 (W.P.No.13626 of 2020 dated 18.12.2020)

respondents to complete the registration of the petitioner’s vehicle (Engine No.KYS4F66551 and Chassis No.MA1UN2KY7S2F47527) with Reg.No.TG-08-AE-0244 without insisting on additional tax amount in addition to the tax paid by the petitioner earlier, subject to the petitioner fulfill all other formalities as per law. There shall be no order as to costs.

6. Registry is directed to annex the copy of order dated

18.12.2020 in W.P.No.13626 of 2020 along with this order.

7. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

_____________________ JUSTICE K.SARATH Date: 11.08.2025 Note: Furnish C.C. by 12.08.2025 (B/o) spk/nit THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION No.23542 of 2025 Date: 11.08.2025 Note: Furnish C.C. by 12.08.2025 (B/o) spk/nit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top