THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI CRIMINAL PETITION No.8014 of 2023

O R D E R

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioners-accused Nos.2 to 5 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings against them in C.C.No.420 of 2023 on the file of the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate at Medak. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 498-A of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘IPC’) and Sections 3, 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act (for short ‘the Act’).

02. Heard Sri P. Srihari Nath, learned counsel for the petitioners-accused and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State-respondent No.1. No representation on behalf of the respondent No.2. Perused the record.

03. In brief, the case of the prosecution is that the marriage between accused No.1 and respondent No.2 was solemnized on 04.05.2022, and they lived together happily for two months. Thereafter, the accused No.1 and the petitioners-accused Nos.2 to 5 subjected her to physical and mental harassment by demanding her to give her total gold to them. They even beat the respondent No.2 and necked out her from the matrimonial home. Aggrieved by the said harassment, the respondent No.2 lodged the present complaint, alleging offences under Section 498-A of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Act.

04. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners-accused Nos.2 to 5 has no involvement whatsoever in the alleged offences and has never subjected the respondent No.2 to any form of harassment. It is submitted that the petitioners-accused Nos.2 and 3 are parents and the petitioner-accused Nos.4 and 5 are the sisters of the accused No.1. They never interfered in the matrimonial affairs between the respondent No.2 and the accused No.1. The petitioners have neither demanded dowry from the respondent No.2 nor from her parents at any point of time. It is further contended that there are no specific or direct allegations made against the petitioners in the charge sheet. The contents of the same do not disclose the essential ingredients necessary to constitute offences under Section 498-A of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Act.

Hence, he prayed to quash the criminal proceedings against the petitioners-accused Nos.2 to 5.

05. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State-respondent No.1 submitted that there are specific allegations against the petitioners and the truth or otherwise would come out only after conducting trial by the concerned Court and prayed to dismiss the Criminal Petition.

06. A perusal of the entire record reveals that after the marriage in the year 2022, the respondent No.2 and accused No.1 lived together happily for two months. It is evident from the record that the petitioners-accused Nos.2 and 3 are the old aged parents of the accused No.1. The petitioners-accused Nos.4 and 5 are the married sisters of the accused No.1 and they are living separately with their families.

07. In Geddam Jhansi and another v. The State of Telangana and others, 2025 INSC 160 wherein the Honourable Supreme Court at Paragraph Nos.31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 and 38 held that:

“31. Invoking criminal process is a serious matter with penal consequences involving coercive measures, which can be permitted only when specific act(s) which constitute offences punishable under the penal code or any other penal statute are alleged or attributed to the accused and a prima facie case is made out. It applies with equal force when criminal laws are invoked in domestic disputes. Criminalising domestic disputes without specific allegations and credible materials to support the same may have disastrous consequences for the institution of family, which is built on the premise of love, affection, cordiality and mutual trust. Institution of family constitutes the core of human society. Domestic relationships, such as those between family members, are guided by deeply ingrained social values and cultural expectations. These relationships are often viewed as sacred, deman