SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 73218

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI
Syed Khutubuddin Quadri – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 386/2025



THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION NO.386 OF 2025

O R D E R

In this Writ Petition, the petitioners are seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of respondents 1 to 5 in taking any steps against the illegal construction being made by the 6th respondent by encroaching into the passage of the petitioners’ property, as illegal and arbitrary.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the 6th respondent, without obtaining any permission from the Gram Panchayat, has made construction of four floors and in spite of several representations being made by the petitioners, no action has been taken by the official respondents. The photographs of the building are also filed to demonstrate that the 6th respondent has constructed four floors on the subject site.

3. Learned Standing Counsel for the 5th respondent Gram Panchayat has relied upon the averments made in the counter affidavit stating that pursuant to the complaint received from the petitioner, the 6th respondent was issued several notices starting from 01.02.2023 till 24.01.2025. He submitted that the skeleton structure has been constructed.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the 6th respondent submitted that the 6th respondent is not making any construction and that the 6th respondent has gifted the property to his sons who are making construction. He also filed copy of the gift deed and further submitted that the sons of the 6th respondent have obtained permission for construction for ground + 2 floors on 06.07.2021 and have accordingly made construction. He has also filed photographs of the building. The learned counsel for the 6th respondent further submitted that the sons of the 6th respondent have made further applications for construction permission after the lapse of the permitted period and the same are under consideration of the 5th respondent.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner, however, disputed gifting of the property by the 6th respondent in favour of his sons.

6. In view thereof, this Court deems it fit and proper to direct the 5th respondent to consider the complaint of the petitioner as well as the documents of the 6th respondent and his sons who have sought building permission and thereafter take a decision in accordance with law, particularly in the light of the notices already issued by the 5th respondent. Till such time that the 5th respondent takes a decision, the 6th respondent or his sons shall not make any further construction and shall maintain status quo obtaining as on today. The 5th respondent shall take a decision within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

8. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.

___________________________ JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI Date: 07.08.2025 Svv

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top