THE HON’BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR Mr.M D Nawaz Hyder Ali, learned Counsel representing Mr. Aruva Raghuram Mahadev, learned Counsel appearing for the appellant.

Mr.K Venkatesh Gupta, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent.

JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya)

We have heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant as well as learned counsel for the respondent on the last occasion i.e., yesterday on 05.08.2025.

2. The facts of the case leading to the impugned judgment dated 21.02.2025 are recorded in the proceeding sheet dated

05.08.2025.

3. The appellant seeks setting aside the impugned order on the ground that the appellant’s application under Section 9 of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the 1996 Act) for restraining the respondent from interfering with the petition schedule property of the appellant, was partly allowed by the learned Commercial Court.

4. However, the learned Commercial Court directed the appellant to clear the arrears of rents, maintenance and electricity charges till the date of the order in respect of the petition schedule property of the appellant. The appellant was directed to mak