SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 73483

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
Polasa Chandrakala – Appellant
Versus
Polasa Ramkiran – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA APPEAL SUIT NOs.2618 OF 2001 AND 113 OF 2005

COMMON JUDGMENT:

A.S.No.2618 of 2001 and A.S.No.113 of 2005 are filed against the judgment and decree in O.S.No.112 of 1990 on the file of Senior Civil Judge at Karimnagar. O.S.No.112 of 1990 was filed by the plaintiff against defendant Nos.1 to 10 for partition and separate possession of 2/3rd share of plaint schedule properties. For the sake of convenience the parties hereinafter referred to as arrayed in O.S.No.112 of 1990.

2. The facts of the case are that plaintiff is the adopted son of late Polasa Shankaraiah. He was duly adopted by late Shankaraiah and his wife who is the 2nd defendant in the suit on 27.02.1978 by performing necessary ceremonies in their house. The 1st defendant is mother and 2nd defendant is widow of late Shankaraiah. Therefore, the plaintiff and defendants 1 and 2 are his legal heirs under Hindu Succession Act and they have succeeded to his properties. Further the properties described in the plaint are allotted to the exclusive share of late Shankaraiah in a partition which are his ancestral joint family properties between himself, his four brothers and the mother i.e, 1st de

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top