IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
Mohammed Najmuddin – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 22841/2025
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY ORDER : (ORAL)
Heard Mr. M.A. Mujeeb, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Midde Arun Kumar, learned standing counsel for the GHMC, appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
2. The primary contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that as per Section 7(11) of the Telangana State Building Permission Approval and Self Certification System (TG- bPASS) Act, 2020 (for short ‘TG-bPASS Act,2020’) read with Section 450 of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act 1955 (for short ‘GHMC Act’), respondent No.3 - the Deputy Commissioner, GHMC, Mehidipatnam, Circle No.12, Hyderabad, does not have any power to revoke the building permission, and the action of respondent No.3 in issuing impugned revocation letter vide Lr.No.296177/GHMC/9990/2023 dated 06.07.2023 is illegal and without jurisdiction.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also placed on record the order passed by this Court in W.P. No.4176 of 2025 dated
06.03.2025, wherein, this Court has set aside the revocation letter issued by the Deputy Commissioner, GHMC, therein.
4. Learned standing counsel for the GHMC, appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3, fairly submitted that the subject matter in this writ petition is squarely covered by the order passed by this Court in W.P. No.4176 of 2025.
5. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of, setting aside the impugned revocation letter issued by respondent No.3 vide Lr.No.296177/GHMC/9990/2023 dated 06.07.2023, and the matter is remanded back to respondent No.2, who shall issue fresh show-cause notice to the petitioner by granting seven (7) days time to submit explanation. On receipt of such explanation, respondent No.2 shall pass orders, in accordance with law, by affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till such exercise is completed, the petitioner is directed not to proceed with the construction in the subject property. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition stand closed.
______________________ B. VIJAYSEN REDDY, J August 01, 2025 MS
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.