SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 74004

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
The Assistant Engineer – Appellant
Versus
The Consumer Grievances Redressal Forum I – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA

ORDER:

This Writ Petition is filed calling for the records and seeking to quash the order dated 29.06.2018 in CG No.94 of

2018 passed by 1st respondent.

2. Heard Sri A.Chandra Shekar, learned Standing Counsel for TSNPDCL for petitioners and Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned counsel for respondent No.2. Perused the record.

3. The brief facts of the case are that petitioners entered into an agreement dated 08.04.2011 to supply electricity under Category-III to M/s. Venkata Sai Brick Industry, Nekkonda Village (Service No. 2112-02488), in the name of Smt. A. Saritha. However, the 2nd respondent was found using the electricity unauthorizedly for commercial godowns, which was not permitted under the sanctioned category. Following inspection, a provisional assessment under Section 126 of the Electricity Act, 2003 was issued on 13.02.2017 for Rs.15,33,996/- for 4 years (from 10.02.2013 to 09.02.2017). Though no timely reply was given, the 2nd respondent later admitted unauthorized use and requested reassessment. After further inspections, a final assessment was issued on 18.10.2017 for Rs.8,67,640/-, confirming unauthorized use. The 2nd respondent file

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top