THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH W.P.Nos.1303 of 2024 & 2895 and 7596 of 2025

COMMON ORDER:

The Writ Petition No.1303 of 2024 is filed declaring the action of the respondents in not taking any action on the representations of the petitioners dated 13.12.2023 for cancellation of the illegal sale deeds and assignment deeds entered by the respondent Nos.5 to 15 fraudulently vide Doc.No.13584/2022 dated 11.04.2022, Doc.No.11503/ 2022 dated 25.03.2022, Doc.No.6819/2018 dated 02.03.2018, Doc.No.11985/2007 and 11986/2007 dated 31.05.2007, as illegal and arbitrary, and consequently direct the respondent Nos.3 and 4 to cancel the same. 2. The W.P.No.2895 of 2025 is filed declaring the action of the respondent No.2 in not receiving and registering the sale deed dated 24.01.2025 presented by the petitioners in respect of the Plot No.140 admeasuring 166.66 Sq. Yards in Survey Nos.1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1006, 1008 and 1009 situated at Ameenpur Village without reference to pendency of W.P.No.1303 of 2024.

3. The W.P.No.7596 of 2025 is filed declaring the action of the respondent No.4 in denying to register the Sale Deeds presented by the petitioners in respect of Plot No.97 admeasuring 166.66 Sq. Yards in Sy.Nos.1001, 1002, 1003, 1004, 1006, 1008 and 1009 situated at Ameenpur Village, referring to the Interim Suspension granted by this Hon’ble Court in I.A.No.2/2024 in W.P.No.1303 of 2004 dated 12.01.2024.

4. The issue involved in all these writ petitions pertains to the same subject property and consequential orders. Therefore, these writ petitions are taken up for hearing together and being disposed of by way of this common order by taking W.P.No.1303 of 2024 as leading case.

5. Heard Sri Vijay B Paropakari, learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P.No.1303 of 2024, Smt. S. Sravanthi, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration appearing for the official respondents and Sri P.Venkat Reddy, learned counsel appearing for unofficial respondent Nos.5 to 8 and 13 in W.P.No.1303 of

2024 and learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P.Nos.2895 and 7596 of 2025.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners purchased Plot Nos.114/C, 115/A and 115/B all forming part of Sy.No.1004 situated at Ameenpur Village, Sangareddy District, through registered sale deeds bearing Document Nos.5415/1984, 14882/2006 and 14881/2006, respectively. Their vendors have claimed the title through the Industrial Employees Cooperative House Building Society Ltd. (for brevity, “the Society”), which purchased lands under several sale deeds and obtained conversion (NALA) proceedings dated 18.06.1987 vide Proc.No.E1-3091/87. The Society have laid out plots over the said lands, which include the lands now claimed by the petitioners.

7. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that one C.J.Shyam Sunder, filed O.S.No.219 of 1982 on the file of II Additional Special Judge for Special Police Establishment (SPE) and Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB), City Civil Court, Hyderabad, seeking partition and separate possession of suit schedule properties against the defendants and a compromise Decree was passed in the said suit on 02.07.1991. Thereafter, the Society filed O.S.No.338 of 2001 on the file of the XIV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, seeking cancellation of compromise Decree dated 02.07.1991 passed in O.S.No.219 of 1982 on the ground of fraud and collusion against the respondents herein. Aggrieved by the final decree dated 08.04.2008 passed in I.A.No.3833/2007 in O.S.No.219/1982 on the file of III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, the plot owners of Narayana Rao Layout, who were not made parties in the suit, preferred C.C.C.A.No.76 of 2016 before this Hon'ble Court with leave petition. This Court was pleased to grant leave by order dated 21.01.2016 and also filed C.C.C.A.M.P.No.281 of 2016 in C.C.C.A.No.76 of 2016, seeking stay of all further proceeding including execution of the final decr