IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI
Padakanti Venkateshwarlu – Appellant
Versus
Dadige Sathyam – Respondent
THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1613 of 2025
ORDER:
The Civil Revision Petition is filed with the following prayer:
“… pleased to set aside the order I.A.No.210/2022 in O.S.No.33/2022, Dt.24/02/2025 on the file of above Principal District and Sessions Judge at Jangaon by allow the petition filed by the Petitioner/Defendant and to pass…”
2. Heard Mr. M.Saleem, learned counsel for revision petitioner and Mr. Srinivasa Rao Madiraju, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3.
3. Learned counsel for revision petitioner submits that under Order VI Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short ‘CPC’) a petition cannot be filed for amendment of schedule of the suit. It is submitted that by permitting the amendment, the trial Court ignored the provisions of CPC. It is further submitted that nature of the suit and subject property cannot be changed by permitting the amendment of schedule. It is also submitted that suit is of the year 2020 and is filed for specific performance of agreement of sale dated 20.12.2018. That the trial Court fell in error in allowing the application bearing I.A.No.210 of 2022 in O.S.No.33 of 2022 under Order VI Rule 17 of C
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.