I N THE HI GH COURT OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WRI T PETI TI ON No.30540 OF 2022 Between Sri Syed Jamal … Petitioner And The State of Telangana & 4 Others … Respondents JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON: 28.07.2025 HON’BLE MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers : Yes may be allowed to see the Judgment?

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be : Yes marked to Law Reporters/Journals?

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to : Yes.

see the fair copy of the Judgment?

________________________________

MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WRIT PETITION No.30540 OF 2022 % 28.07.2025 Between:

# Syed Jamal … Petitioner And $ The State of Telangana & 4 Others … Respondents Gist:

> Head Note:

! Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri Ch.Ganesh ^ Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 3: AGP for Services-I ^ Counsel for Respondent Nos.4&5:Sri Kishore Rao P. learned standing counsel ? Cases Referred:

(i) (2020) 1 SCC (L&S)

(ii) 1990(2) SCC Page 396 (iii) 2025 INSC 144 (iv) 2024 Law Suit(SC) 1209 (v) (2017) 1 SCC 148 (vi) 2010(9) SCC 247 (vii) (2013) 14SCC 65 (viii) 2015 SCC Online SC 1797 (ix) (2015) 8 SCC 265 (x) (2014) 7 SCC 223 (xi) SLP No.32847 of 2024 (xii) AIR 2020 Supreme Court 3969 (xiii) (2006) 4 SCC 1 (xiv) 2011 (1) ALD, Page 234 (xv) 2018(2)ALD page 282 (xvi) 2020(4)ALD page 379 HON’BLE MRS JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA WRI T PETI TI ON No.30540 OF 2022

ORDER:

Heard Sri Ch.Ganesh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj Rural Development, appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 3, learned Government Pleader for Finance Planning, appearing on behalf of respondent No.3 and Sri Kishore Rao Puskuru, learned Standing Counsel for TG Zilla Parishads, appearing on behalf of respondent No.4.

2. The petitioner approached this Court with the following prayer:

“…to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to treat the services of the petitioner as regular one in the last grade post for continuously working till date in temporary post of last grade in contingent establishment on compassionate grounds from 19-06-1989 nor regularizing her services even on completion of 33 long years service by not extending the last grade pay benefits with periodical increments from time to time with effect from 19-06-1989 to till date from time to time with arrears as per GO Ms No 687 dated 03-10-1977 and GO Ms. No.661 dated 23- 10-2008 to till date is highly unjust and unfair as per Articles 14, 16, 21, 39 (d), 43 and 300 (A) of Constitution of India by subjecting petitioner for exploitative enslavement due to her helpless conditions of poverty poor social economical and political background by taking it as advantage by the respondents in continuing her on pittance wages of Rs 1623/- p.m. and prays to direct the respondent herein to treat the temporary services of petitioner in the last grade post of sweeper as regular one for all purposes by granting last grade pay with periodical increment revised from time to time from the date of appointment of the petitioner for working 33 long years without any service progress with 100 percent compensation on arrears of pay as per the principle laid by the Honble Supreme Court in C.A. No.3416 3445 of 2010 dated 19- 02-2019 in the case of Union of India Vs Avtar Chand 2019 3 ALD SC 32 and in the case of Prem Singh Vs State of UP and Batch cases reported in 2019 10 SCC 516 in paras 36 and 37 in the case of Netram Sahu Vs State of Chattisgarh and Anr in Civil Appeal No 1254 of 2018 dated 23/03/2018 followed by DB Orders issued in the case of Kadar Basha in WP No. 26788 of 2017 dated 10/08/2017 DB with cost by applying aforesaid principle laid by the Honble Apex Court under Article

141 of our Constitution and pass...

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner placing reliance on the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the present writ petition pertaining in partic