HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN Review I.A. No.2 OF 2025 IN W.P. No.18558 OF 2025 ALONG WITH C.C. No.1714 OF 2025

COMMON ORDER

Heard Mr. S. Rahul Reddy, learned Special Government Pleader representing learned Additional Advocate General appearing for review petitioners - respondent Nos.2 and 3 in W.P. No.18558 of 2025 and Mr. Masthan Vali Shaik, learned counsel representing Mr. Vijay Kumar Panuganti, learned counsel for respondent No.1 - writ petitioner.

2. I.A. No.2 of 2025 is filed by respondent Nos.2 and 3 in W.P.

No.18558 of 2025 under Order - XLVII, Rule - 1 read with Section - 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short ‘CPC’), to review the order dated 02.07.2025 in W.P. No.18558 of 2025.

3. Respondent No.1 herein is the writ petitioner in W.P.

No.18558 of 2025. He has filed the aforesaid writ petition to declare the inaction of the respondents therein in considering his representation dated 18.06.2025 for Diploma in Electrical and Electronics Engineering as equivalent to Intermediate as per G.O.Ms.No.112, dated 27.10.2001 issued by the Secretary, State Board of Technical Education and Training, Telangana at Hyderabad, as illegal.

4. The aforesaid writ petition came up for hearing on

02.07.2025, on which date, learned Government Pleader for Higher Education, on instructions, submitted that the Diploma Course studied by the writ petitioner is equivalent to Intermediate. She has also placed reliance on the Certificate dated 16.06.2025 issued by the Deputy Secretary (Academics), State Board of Technical Education and Training (SBTET), Hyderabad and G.O.Ms.No.11, dated 27.10.2001 filed by the writ petitioner along with writ petition. Thus, according to learned Government Pleader for Higher Education, respondent No.1 herein - writ petitioner is entitled to participate in the Certificate verification and also counselling for admission into the said two year course.

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for School Education appeared for respondent No.3 in the writ petition submitted that once the writ petitioner gets admission into the above said two year course i.e., D.EI.Ed., and completes the same, he is entitled to appear for the post of Secondary Grade Teacher. Therefore, he has to necessarily study Telugu and English Languages at Intermediate level. The writ petitioner did not possess the said criterion. Thus, he is not entitled for admission into the above said two years Diploma Course.

6. Considering the said submission made by learned Government Pleader for Higher Education, certificate dated 16.06.2025 issued by the Deputy Secretary (Academics), SBTET and G.O.Ms.No.11, dated 27.10.2001, vide order dated 02.07.2025, this Court disposed of the said writ petition directing the petitioners herein - respondent Nos.2 and 3 in the said writ petition to permit the writ petitioner to produce the required certificates, and on producing the same, they shall complete the certificate verification and if the writ petitioner is found otherwise eligible for the aforesaid two year Diploma Course, they shall grant admission to the writ petitioner without raising any objection that the aforesaid course studied by the writ petitioner is not equivalent to Intermediate.

7. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 in the writ petition filed the present review application to review the said order dated 02.07.2025 contending as follows:

i) The Telangana Elementary Teacher Education Institutions/District Institutes of Education and Training (Regulation of Admissions into Diploma in Elementary Education (D.EI.Ed.) Programme through Common Entrance Test) Rules, 2017 (for short ‘Rules, 2017’) were framed by the Government of Telangana vide G.O.Ms.No.10, School Education (Prog.II) Department, dated 12.04.2017. As per Rule - 4 (iii) (a) of the said Rules, 2017, candidate shall pass or appear for the Intermediate Examination (Qualifying Exam) or its equivalent as decided by the DEECET Committee for appearing at the DEECET.

ii) In the present case, the writ petition