SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 74386

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
Punamehand Lahoti – Appellant
Versus
The State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR W.P.Nos.20922 of 2009 & 30132 of 2010 and C.R.P.No.4191 of 2010

COMMON ORDER

Since the issue involved in both the Writ Petitions is one and the same and the issue involved in the Civil Revision Petition is also integrally connected to the issue under consideration in the Writ Petitions, all the three cases, viz., WPs and CRP, are being disposed of by this common order.

W.P.No.20922 of 2009

2. The petitioner claims of he having purchased land to an extent of Acs.3.08 guntas in Sy.No.797/A, an extent of Ac.1.07 guntas in Sy.No.797/AA, in all admeasuring Acs.4.15 guntas, from its original owners, Sri Raza Ali Shah S/o Maroof Ali Shah and Farath Ali Shah s/o Maroof Ali Shah, under a registered sale deed dt.09.01.2001 for valuable consideration and on purchase of the aforesaid land, the same was mutated on to his name in revenue records; and that he was also issued with pattadar pass book and title deeds by the concerned authorities.

3. It is the further case of the petitioner that thereafter, he had sold land to an extent of Ac.1.15 guntas back to his vendors through a registered sale deed and is in possession of land to an extent of Acs.3.00 guntas;

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top