Global Lawyers Debate AI Liability in Autonomous Vehicles
03 Mar 2026
CCPA Fines Startup ₹8 Lakh for False Child Growth Claims
05 Mar 2026
Madras High Court Scoffs at Police Custody Injury Claim
05 Mar 2026
India's Criminal Investigations Face Systemic Conviction Crisis
05 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Slams TDB Financial Discipline in Ayyappa Conclave, Orders Auditor Report on Past Anomalies: High Court of Kerala
06 Mar 2026
ST Members Can Invoke Section 13B HMA If Hinduised By Customs: Chhattisgarh High Court
06 Mar 2026
Lease Cancellation Valid Even by 'In-Charge' Mining Officer Under OMMC Rules: Orissa High Court
06 Mar 2026
Ignoring Court-Mandated PWD Safety Report Invalidates Municipal Order: J&K&L High Court
06 Mar 2026
Kerala HC Reserves Verdict in Raju Tampering Conviction Plea
06 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI
S. Siddharth – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA *****
CRIMINAL PETITION No.6179 of 2023 Between:
S.Siddharth ... Petitioner AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad and another ...Respondents DATE OF ORDER: 25th July, 2025 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:
THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI
1 Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to Yes/No see the Judgment?
2 Whether the copies of judgment may be marked to Law Yes/No Reporters/Journals
3 Whether HER Lordship wish to see the fair copy of the Yes/No Judgment?
___________________
JUVVADI SRIDEVI, J * THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI + Criminal Petition No.6179 of 2023 % Date: 25
The judgment established the importance of proving mensrea and actus reus in defamation cases, the requirement for authorization from the aggrieved person, and the high threshold for placing restrict....
Individuals with influence on social media have a higher responsibility for their messages and cannot escape consequences by issuing apologies.
The court established that the definitions and interpretations of 'obscene acts' and 'public place' under the IPC are broad, and the intent behind actions is crucial in determining the applicability ....
Essential ingredients for offences under Sections 294(b) and 509 IPC were not demonstrated, leading to quashing of proceedings.
(1) Vulgarity and profanities do not per se amount to obscenity.
(2) All sex-oriented material and nudity per se are not always obscene – Obscenity must be judged with regard to contemporary mores....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article