SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 74465

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
Maddela Santhosh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Thumula Nambaiah – Respondent


HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1855 OF 2025

ORAL ORDER

Heard Mrs. R. Madhavi Latha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Avani Reddy, learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2. In the cause title, it is mentioned as respondent Nos.3 to 5 are not necessary parties.

2. This revision is filed under Article - 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 03.01.2025 in I.A. No.349 of 2024 in O.S. No.176 of 2020 passed by learned Junior Civil Judge at Peddapalli.

3. Vide the aforesaid order, learned trial Court allowed the aforesaid I.A. No.349 of 2024 setting aside the order 25.11.2021 passed by the trial Court forfeiting the right of defendant Nos.1 and 2 in filing written statement on payment of costs of Rs.1000/-.

4. The petitioner herein is the plaintiff, while respondents herein are defendants in the aforesaid suit O.S. No.176 of 2020. The petitioner filed the said suit against the respondents for perpetual injunction. In the said suit, right of defendant Nos.1 and 2 to file written statement was forfeited on 25.11.2021. Therefore, they filed a petition vide I.A. No.349 of 2024 in O.S. No.176 of 2020 on 21.12.2023 to set aside the said

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top