SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 74553

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
Ryakamaiah – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


HON’BLE MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA WRI T PETI TI ON No.15961 OF 2023

ORDER:

Heard Sri C.Rajashekar Reddy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services Home appearing on behalf of the respondents.

2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under:

“…to issue a writ order or orders more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus by declaring the Impugned Proc No A4/05/Major-PR-2017-19, DO. No. 798/2019, Dt 24/07/ 2019 of the 2nd respondent and further Impugned Appeal Rejection order in R.O.No. 943/2019, Rc No. 886/D141/HR/2019, dt 6/11/2019 of the 3rd respondent and further consequential Impugned Revision Rejection order in R.O.No.21/2020 Rc.No.1242/PR/WZ/2019, dt 27/01/2020 of the 4th respondent and final consequential Impugned Review Rejection order in C.No. A4/11/Misc-PR/NRPT/2022, dt 11/05/2022 of the 5th respondent by imposing a punishment of PPI for one year without effect on future increment and pension and the suspension period from 19/8/2017 to 31/12/2017 (134 days) is treated as not on duty is highly illegal arbitrary unreasonable discriminatory and without any application of mind and also v

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top