IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
Srikanth Setti – Appellant
Versus
State of Telanagana – Respondent
WP 21440/2025
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.21440 of 2025
ORDER
Heard Sri G.Ravi Chandrasekhar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents.
2. Petitioners are residents of Ramakrishnapuram Village, Chintakani Mandal, Khammam District. They are voters of Madhira Assembly Constituency. Their names were deleted from the draft publication of electoral list during Parliament Elections, illegally. Therefore, they have filed writ petition vide W.P.No.17333 of 2024 to declare the action of respondents in not including the names of the petitioners in the voters’ list prepared for General Elections of House of People, 2024 in respect of Madhira Assembly Constituency (114) of Khammam District. Vide order dated 28.11.2024, this Court disposed of the said writ petition granting liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal before the District Collector, Khammam, if they are so aggrieved by the orders dated 23.01.2024 and 24.01.2024 passed by respondent No.5 i.e., the Election Returning Officer-cum-Revenue Divisional Officer, Khammam Division, Khammam District. This Court directed the District Collector to consider the said appeal and dispose it of within two weeks from the date of receipt of such application.
3. In compliance with the said order, vide order dated 05.06.2025 in proceedings Rc.No.H1/Elec/0001/2025, respondent No.2 allowed the said appeal in-part and directed respondent No.3 to include names of petitioner Nos.2 to 6 in the Electoral roll part No.72, 73 and 74 of Ramakrishnapuram Village, Chinthakani mandal. In respect of petitioner No.1, liberty was granted to file Form-6 application for inclusion of his name before respondent No.3 on the ground that he did not attend for the enquiry. Despite the said order, respondent No.3 is not implementing the same. Therefore, aggrieved by the said inaction of respondent No.3, petitioner has filed the present writ petition.
4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, would submit that respondent No.3 will implement the said order of respondent No.2.
5. In the light of the said submissions, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.3 to implement the order dated 05.06.2025 in proceedings Rc.No.H1/Elec/0001/2025 of respondent No.2 in respect of petitioner Nos.2 to 6 within 15 working days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. In respect of petitioner No.1, liberty is granted to file Form-6 application before respondent No.3 within one (1) week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and on filing of such application, respondent No.2 shall dispose it of within two (2)
weeks thereafter. There shall be no orders as to costs.
As a sequel, thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.
___________________
K. LAKSHMAN, J Date: 24.07.2025 Note: Issue C.C by 28.07.2025 B/o. PNS/SZT
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.