IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
A. Namitha – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR Writ Petition No.21402 of 2025
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 2, and Ms.Laeeq Unnisa Begum, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4 and with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at the admission stage.
2. Having regard to the manner of disposal of the Writ Petition at the admission stage and the nature of lis involved, this Court is of the view that notice to unofficial respondent No.3 is not necessary for adjudication of the present Writ Petition.
3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the case of the petitioners, in brief, is that based on the communication/intimation of the 2nd respondent, the 3rd respondent herein has freezed the bank account of the petitioners purported to be in connection with Crime No.6 of 2025 dt.02.01.2025 without issuing any notice to the petitioners, even though they are not arrayed as accused in the aforesaid crime, which action of the respondents-authorities it is contended as highly illegal, arbitrary, abuse of process of law and in violation of Arti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.