SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 74763

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
Mallikarjun Rao Kodumuri – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
CRLP 9212/2025



THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI CRIMINAL PETITION No. 9212 OF 2025

ORDER

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS, 2023’) seeking quashment of the proceedings, against the petitioner/accused in Crime No.148 of 2025 on the file of the Julurpad Police Station, Bhadradri-

Kothagudem District.

2. The petitioner is arrayed as sole accused in Crime Case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272 and 275 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha, 2023.

3. Heard Mr.Y.Bala Murali, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, representing the respondents.

4. The prosecution case in brief is that the petitioner/accused is involved in selling and purchasing the banned Tobacco products and the Police concerned has seized the said Tobacco products worth of Rs.32,950/- from the possession of the petitioner.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that a Coordinate Bench of this Court vide Criminal Petition Nos.3731 and Batch on considering similar allegations and the merits quashed the proceedings against the petitioner therein. He further submits that the 2nd respondent has registered the present crime in violation of the orders passed by this Court. Hence, prayed for quashment of the proceedings against the petitioner in the calendar case.

6. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner has been found with the Tobacco products and investigation is pending. However fairly admitted that in the authority cited by the petitioner in the similar circumstances, the proceedings against the petitioner therein were quashed.

7. I have perused the materials on record.

8. As per the prosecution, on 15.07.2025 at 07.00 hours, the complainant/Sub-Inspector of Police lodged a complaint alleging that while the complainant is performing patrolling duty at Julurupad village outskirts of Nayak Rice Mill, the petitioner came in opposite direction, meantime his staff suspected the petitioner and chased him and apprehended the accused and found tobacco products i.e., 1) Amber 88 packets- worth Rs.22,000/-, 2)Vimal-16 packets- worth Rs.2,000/-, 3) Pan Bahar 10 packets- worth Rs.2,050/-, 4)Hai Chewing Tobacco 28 packets-worth Rs.22,000/-, 5)JK Tobacco 9 packets, worth Rs.450/-, 6)RR Tobacco 7 packets-worth Rs.1,190/-, 7)VI-Tobacco 20 packets-

worth Rs.500/-, total worth of Rs.32,950/- from the possession of the petitioner under the cover of panchanama.

9. It is pertinent to note that the related Notification No.501/FSS/I/2022 dated 07.01.2022, prohibiting manufacturing, storing, distribution, transportation and sale of gutka and pan masala in the entire State of Telangana, has been stayed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Shri Venkateshwara Traders v. State of Telangana and others vide SLA No.20441 of 2021 with SLP(C) No.1656 of 2022. Thereafter, the Director General of Police, Telangana State issued Circular Memorandum in RC.No. 295/R1-NS/2022 with directions to the Station House Officers not to interfere with the business activities, who carry out the business as per rules of Food Safety and Standards Authority of India and also not to take any coercive measures against the tobacco traders as long as the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court is in force.

10. Having regard to similar factual position in the criminal petition relied on by the petitioner vide Crl.P.No.6235 of 2022 held that against the allegations of illegal sale and transportation of tobacco products the accusations under Sections 188, 269, 270, 272, 273, 278, 328 read with Sections 511, 336, 409 and 420 of I.P.C., cannot be maintained and quashed the proceedings against the petitioners therein.

11. In the instant petition, the prosecution for possession and allegation of sale arraigned the offences under Sections 272, 275 of BNS, 2023 as noted above, the conclusions drawn in the earlier criminal petition are squarely measuring up t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top