THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

ORDER:

Aggrieved by the action of the respondents, more particularly, respondent No.3 in issuing the impugned order vide Lr.No.DE/OP/SRPT/JAO/ADM/D.No.2195/12 dated 16.10.2012, rejecting the claim of the petitioner for regularization, the present writ petition has been filed.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner had joined the services of respondent Corporation on 19.09.1989 as a Village Electricity Worker, and he had been working as such, until the respondents prevented him from discharging his duties in December, 1997. Thereafter, the petitioner was called for an interview on 08.02.1999, after which, he was once permitted to discharge his duties, by re-employing him in the same post of Village Electricity Officer from March, 2002. However, without assigning any reasons, the respondents once again orally terminated him on 01.08.2002. Thus, the petitioner approached the Labour Court-III, Hyderabad, and filed I.D.No.31 of 2005, which was allowed vide award dated 24.10.2006, setting aside the oral termination order dated

01.08.2002, and the respondents were directed to reinstate the petitioner as Village Electricity Worker, with c