SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 74899

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
Sirishetty Rajesh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 20988/2025



THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION No.20988 of 2025

ORDER

Heard Sri C.Ramachandra Raju, learned counsel for the petitioner; the learned Government Pleader for Home and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for School Education, for respondent Nos.1, 4 and 5 respectively.

2. The petitioner herein has submitted a representation dated 08.04.2025 to the 3rd respondent stating that the 7th respondent-petrol bunk is adjacent to the 6th respondent- School and the same is in violation of guidelines issued by Control Pollution Control Board, New Delhi, in Office Memorandum No.B-13011/1/2019-20/AQM, dated 07.01.2020. Therefore, he has requested the 3rd respondent to remove the 7th respondent-petrol bunk, which is adjacent to the 6th respondent school. On receipt of the said representation, the 2nd respondent transferred the said Even then, the 5th respondent has taken any action. Therefore, aggrieved by the said inaction of the 5th respondent, the petitioner filed the present writ petition.

3. Learned Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, submits that the 7th respondent-petrol bunk was established first and thereafter, the 6th respondent-school was started in the said premises situated at Huzurabad, Karimnagar. However, the 5th respondent will examine the representation dated 08.04.2025 submitted by the petitioner herein and take action strictly, in accordance with law, by putting the petitioner and the 6th and the 7th respondent on notice and affording them an opportunity.

4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue has produced G.O.Ms.No.56, Home (Services.IV) Department, dated 26.07.2019, to contend that the 6th respondent-school cannot run school within 50 meters from 7th respondent-

petrol bunk.

5. In the light of the said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 5th respondent to examine the representation dated 08.04.2025 submitted by the petitioner dated 19.05.2025, and take action, in accordance with law, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, by putting the petitioner and the 6th and the 7th respondent on notice and affording them with an opportunity. The 3rd respondent shall consider the aforesaid G.O. and guidelines issued by Control Pollution Control Board in Office Memorandum No.B-13011/1/2019-20/AQM, dated 07.01.2020, and he shall also consider the fact that the petrol bunk was established first and permission was granted to the school thereafter, while disposing the representation dated 08.04.2025. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________ K. LAKSHMAN, J

22.07.2025 Nvl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top