HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

JUDGMENT:

The Second Appeal is filed aggrieved by the judgment and decree, dated 05.02.2025, passed by the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Sanga Reddy in A.S.No.59 of 2022, by which the judgment and decree, dated 13.06.2018, passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Medak in O.S.No.78 of 2012 was set aside.

2. The appellants herein are defendants and respondent herein is plaintiff in the suit. The parties hereinafter referred to as they are arrayed in the suit.

3. The brief facts of the case as averred in the plaint are that plaintiff filed suit O.S.No.78 of 2012 seeking perpetual injunction in respect of suit schedule property against defendants. In the plaint it is averred that plaintiff is the owner and pattadar of suit schedule property which is ancestral property and he raised sugar cane crop in the lands and his name was also recorded as pattadar in revenue record and pattadar pass book has also been issued; that defendants without any manner of right trying to interfere with the possession of suit schedule property and hence, the suit for injunction.

4. Defendant No.1 filed the written statement which was adopted by the other defendant