SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 74981

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
SMT. KANDALA PULAMMA – Appellant
Versus
CHENNU VIJAYA VENKATA LAKSHMANA KUMAR – Respondent


*THE HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO + APPEAL SUIT NO.305 OF 2020 % 18—07—2025 # Smt. Kandala Pulamma … Appellant vs.

$ Chennu Vijaya Venkata Lakshmana Kumar … Respondent !Counsel for the Appellant: Mr.J.Ashvini Kumar ^Counsel for Respondent: Mr.Vedula Srinivas learned Senior Counsel appearing for Mr.Seeta Ramaiah Tenneti

>Head Note :

? Cases referred:

AIR 1965 SC 1591 2014 (1) SCC 105 2015 (16) SCC 787 AIR OnLine 2013 AP 133 AIR 2016 Hyderabad 24 Indian Kanoon – http://indiankanoon.org/doc/107888899/

______________________________

B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO,J IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA HYDERABAD * * * *

APPEAL SUIT NO.305 OF 2020 Between:

Smt. Kandala Pulamma … Appellant And Chennu Vijaya Venkata Lakshmana Kumar … Respondent JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON: 18.07.2025 THE HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgments? : No

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be Marked to Law Reporters/Journals? : Yes

3. Whether His Lordship wishes to see the fair copy of the Judgment? : Yes _______________________________

B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO,J THE HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO APPEAL SUIT NO.305 OF 2020

JUDGMENT:

1. This appeal is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top