SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 75018

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
Mrs. Nalini Chander – Appellant
Versus
Mr. Beeshwa Om Prakash – Respondent
CRP 1765/2025



HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI Civil Revision Petition No.1765 of 2025

ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition is filed, aggrieved by the interlocutory order, dated 25.03.2025 passed in I.A.No.294 of 2025 in O.S.No.478 of 2022 by the XXIV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

2. Heard Sri K. Mohan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Ms. Bhargavi, learned counsel representing Sri Vempati Mallikarjun Shastry, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner had contended that the petitioner-plaintiff is the owner of the suit respondent is not paying the arrears of rent and also not vacating the suit schedule premises. In those set of circumstances, the petitioner has filed O.S.No.478 of 2022 for eviction of the respondent from the suit schedule premises. In the said suit, the petitioner has also filed I.A.No.294 of 2025 under Order XV-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, seeking a direction to the respondent to pay arrears of Rs.2,56,42,429.40/-. The vide trial Court, order dated 25.03.2025, directed the respondent to deposit Rs.1,00,00,000/- only. To the extent of not granting arrears as claimed by the petitioner, the present revision is filed.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner had further contended that let the revision be disposed of directing the trial Court to dispose of the main suit i.e., O.S.No.478 of 2022 itself, as expeditiously as possible. 5. On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondent had contended that the trial Court has rightly directed the respondent to deposit Rs.1,00,00,000/- as against the false claim made by the petitioner. Therefore, there are no merits in the revision and the same is liable to be dismissed.

6. Having considered the rival submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, this Court is of the view that the present revision can be disposed of by directing the trial Court to dispose of the main suit i.e. O.S.No.478 of 2022 itself, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of one (01) year from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The trial Court shall adjudicate the said suit without being influenced by any of the observations made by this Court.

7. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________

ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J

_

Date: 18.07.2025

myk/rkk

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top