SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 75027

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI
VEERANNA RAICHUR DIST – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA SEC-BAD – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.248 OF 2014

JUDGMENT:

Aggrieved by order, dated 23.03.2011, in O.A.A.No.164 of 2006 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Secunderabad Bench at Secunderabad, the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed.

2. Heard Ms. N.S.Geetha Madhuri, learned counsel for appellant, and Mr. Sanjeev Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent.

3. Appellant/applicant is the son of the deceased, claims a compensation of Rs.4,00,000/- for death of his father. It is the case of the appellant/applicant that his father (deceased) went to Yadgir (place) to visit his relative(s), in return journey the deceased along with his relative (Subramaniam) came to Yadgir Station on 18.06.2005, purchased a ticket and boarded train No.545, Bijapur-Raichur Passenger, for Raichur. While travelling, the deceased fell accidentally from the train at Kilometer No.589/0-1 between Chegunta and Krishna Railway Stations and died. In the accident, the deceased lost his bag and ticket was in that bag. Railway Claims Tribunal examined AW1 and AW2 (for applicant), RW1 (for respondent) considered Exs.A1 to A6 (marked on behalf of applicant), Exs.R1 to R4

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top