SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 75111

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
Banoth Sriram – Appellant
Versus
Shaik Hameeda – Respondent
CRP 1234/2025



HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1234 OF 2025 ORDER:-

This Civil Revision Petition is filed to direct the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge – cum – Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Mahabubabad to dispose of I.A.No.2 of 2024 in O.S.No.207 of 2024 within a reasonable period.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the sole respondent herein filed O.S.No.207 of 2024 before the trial Court seeking permanent injunction in respect of suit schedule property against the petitioners herein. Along with the suit, the respondent filed I.A.No.2 of 2024 under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking interim injunction, wherein the trial Court was pleased to grant ad interim injunction against the petitioners for limited period i.e., till

16.06.2025.

3. The grievance of the petitioner is that though a detailed counter has been filed by the petitioners in the said interlocutory application, the trial Court failed to dispose of the same. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners herein filed the present Civil Revision Petition to direct the trial Court to dispose

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. Despite serving notice on the respondent, there is no representation on behalf of the respondent. Thus, this Court is of the considered opinion that the present Civil Revision Petition may be disposed of at the stage of admission.

5. A perusal of the record discloses that on 17.10.2024 the trial Court granted ad interim injunction till 30.10.2024 and on 05.03.2025 the interim injunction order was extended till 16.06.2025. Though counters have been filed by the contesting respondents, the trial Court failed to dispose of the interlocutory application within a reasonable time.

6. In view of the above facts and circumstances, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge – cum – Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Mahabubabad to dispose of I.A.No.2 of 2024 in within three (03) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order by giving reasonable opportunity to both the sides by following the due procedure of law. Both the parties shall cooperate and coordinate with the trial Court by not seeking unnecessary adjournments.

7. With the above observations, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

____________________________ NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J Date: 18.07.2025 AS

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top