SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 75226

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH
Mohd. Khalid – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
WP 20281/2025



THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH

ORDER:

Heard Sri Jalli Kanakaiah, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri M.Vigneshwar Reddy, learned Government Pleader for Transport for the respondent Nos.1 to 4 and perused the entire material on record.

2. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners submits that aggrieved by the action of the respondent No.3 in vide issuing guidelines Memo No.6027/R/2021, dated 26.06.2025 in pursuance to the G.O.Rt.No.263, dated 06.06.2025 restricting the petitioners to purchase the vehicle from the showroom, in which he made application for getting of temporary permit for plying of the vechile as illegal and arbitrary.

3. Learned Government Pleader for Transport appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 4 produced a copy of written instructions issued by the respondent No.3 and submits that initially there was a provision in the software to generate the temporary registration certificate by the dealer, who has submitted the application, but later, it has been modified and the intended purchaser after getting permission at one dealer can approach any dealer in the State to purchase the vehicle. With this modification the applicants are not required to mention that “they shall purchase the new auto ricksaw only from the dealer where the application is generated” in the undertaking to be submitted at the time of filing application and the same has been deleted from the sample undertaking and uploaded in the CFST portal. This has been modified considering the request of the petitioner Nos.1 and 2 made in their representations, dated 09.07.2025 and the representations received from others. In view of the same, the cause in the writ petition does not survive.

4. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners requested to record the submissions made by learned Government Pleader for Transport appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to

4 and pass appropriate orders.

5. In view of the submissions made by the both sides, the cause in the writ petition does not survive and accordingly, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

6. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

_____________________ JUSTICE K.SARATH Date: 17.07.2025 Note: Furnish C.C. by 22.07.2025.

(B/o.)EDS

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top