I N THE HI GH COURT OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WRI T PETI TI ON No.18727 OF 2021 Between:

Sri Mohammed Vazed Ali … Petitioners And The State of Telangana & Others … Respondents JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON: 16.07.2025 THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA

1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers : Yes may be allowed to see the Judgment?

2. Whether the copies of judgment may be : Yes marked to Law Reporters/Journals?

3. Whether Their Lordships wish to : Yes.

see the fair copy of the Judgment?

________________________________

MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA I N THE HI GH COURT OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD WRI T PETI TI ON No.18727 OF 2021 % 16.07.2025 Between:

# Sri Mohammed Vazed Ali … Petitioner And $ The State of Telangana & Others … Respondents Gist:

> Head Note:

! Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri Ch.Ganesh ^ Counsel for Respondent No.1 to 3: AGP for Services-II ^ Counsel for Respondent Nos.4 & 5: Sri Pradeep Reddy Katta, learned standing counsel ? Cases Referred:

i)(2020) 1 SCC (L&S)

(ii) 1990(2) SCC Page 396 (iii) 2025 I NSC 144 (iv) 2024 LawSuit(SC) 1209 (v) (2017) 1 SCC 148 (vi) 2010(9) SCC 247 (vii) (2013) 14SCC 65 (viii) 2015 SCC Online SC 1797 (ix) (2015) 8 SCC 265 (x) (2014) 7 SCC 223 (xi) SLP No.32847 of 2024 (xii) AI R 2020 Supreme Court 3969 (xiii) (2006) 4 SCC 1 (xiv) 2011 (1) ALD, Page 234 (xv) 2018(2)ALD page 282 (xvi) 2020(4)ALD page 379 HON’BLE MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA WRI T PETI TI ON No.18727 OF 2021

ORDER:

Heard Sri CH.Ganesh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Sri Pradeep Reddy Katta, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent Nos.4 & 5.

2. The petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under:

“…to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent herein to convert the full contingent appointment of petitioner made temporarily on compassionate grounds by 4th Respondent in Procs No. B/92/1997 dated 29/06/1997 by regularizing his services in last grade post as per G.O.Ms.No.687 (GAD) dated 03/10/1077 and G.O.Ms. No. 661(GAD) dated 23/10/2008 with effect from 29/06/2002 to till date with all consequential monetary benefits including seniority and arrears of pay in the last grade post for 4 long years from time to time with 100 Percent compensation by applying principle laid by Apex Court in the case of Union of India Vs Avtar Chand in Civil Appeal No. 3416-3445 of 2010 dt 19/02/2019 under Article 141 of our constitution by this Honourable court for wrongly treating the Petitioner as part time employee contrary to appointment order of contingent sweeper by wrongly paying part time wages instead of legitimate wages of FTS to the Petitioner in violation of Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 by subjecting the petitioner to exploitative enslavement due to his helpless conditions of poverty Poor social financial political background in denying his legitimate wages of FTS from 24 long years and also award costs of the case and pass…”

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner placing reliance on the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of the present writ petition pertaining in particular, to the services rendered by petitioner with the respondents herein for more than a decade contends that the petitioner is entitled for the relief as prayed for in the present writ petition.

PERUSED THE RECORD:-

DI SCUSSI ON AND CONCLUSI ON:-

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the subject issue in the present case is squarely covered by the order of this Court, dated 08.09.2010 passed in W.P.No.24377 of 2007 reported in 2011(1) ALD, Page 234 as confirmed in W.A.No.782 of 2010, dated 10.06.2013 and also order, dated 19.09.2017 passed in W.P.No.27217 of 2017 reported in 2018 (2) ALD Page 282 and also the order, dated 21.04.2020 passed in W.P.No.23057 of 2019 repor