THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR W.P.No.20107 of 2025

O R D E R

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 4, and with their consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for hearing and disposal at admission stage.

2. Having regard to the manner of disposal of the writ petition and the nature of lis involved, this Court is of the view that notice to respondent Nos.5 to 11 is not necessary for adjudication of the present Writ Petition

3. The case of the petitioners, in brief, is that the 4th respondent-authority had freezed the petitioners’ bank accounts maintained with unofficial respondents herein without following due process of law as well as Section 102(3) of Cr.P.C., which action of the respondents-authorities it is contended as highly illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14, 19 & 21 of the Constitution of India, with a consequential direction to defreeze the petitioners’ bank accounts.

4. Per contra, learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondents-authorities while denying the writ averments would submit that based on the complaint dt.26.11.2024, made by one L.Venkateshwarlu, a