SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 75455

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
Smt N.Vahini – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


HON’BLE MRS. JUSTI CE SUREPALLI NANDA WRI T PETI TI ON No.14023 OF 2023

ORDER:

Heard Sri Arvind Kumar Kata, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I I , appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Sri. K. Pradeep Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for TS Zilla Parishads, appearing on behalf of the respondent No.3.

2. The petitioners filed the writ petition seeking the following relief “…to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS:-

(a) By declaring the entire action of the respondents, in not regularizing the services of the petitioners and not declaring probation in the cadre of Typist and also not releasing periodical increments and other allied benefits, despite of possessing B.Sc (Computers) by the 1st petitioner and B.Tech (Computers) as well as PGDCA by the 2nd petitioner, on the untenable ground that, the petitioners did not acquire typewriting qualification mentioned in the orders of appointment other way issuing impugned Memo.No. PRRD-MZET/1/29/2021- dated 19.07.2022 by the 1st respondent and consequential show cause notice No.A2/1858/2020 dated 20.03.2023 by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top