IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
Sujith Kumar Upadhay – Appellant
Versus
Amrita Mishra – Respondent
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
ORDER:
This petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code (for short ‘Cr.P.C) to quash the proceedings in C.C No.3039 of 2021, pending on the file of the learned XI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad (herein after referred as “the trial Court”) against the petitioner-
accused.
2. Heard Mr. Pradyumna Kumar Reddy, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr.T.Anirudh Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Thomas Lloyd, learned counsel for respondent No.1 and Mr. E.Ganesh, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No.2 – State.
3. The brief facts of the case are that on 31.12.2020 at 15.00 hours the de-facto complainant-LW.1 lodged a complaint against the petitioner wherein she stated that her father Mr.Sidheswar Upadhyaya’s property and other assets are with her younger brother Sujith Kumar Upadhyaya, who is also known as SKU in the family. Further, the complainant stated that the inheritance property and company share which should have been given to the daughters is not given to her by her brother. Many discussions have taken place, but he did not give her share. On 26.11.2016 she se
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.