SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 75491

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL
Sujith Kumar Upadhay – Appellant
Versus
Amrita Mishra – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL

ORDER:

This petition is filed under Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code (for short ‘Cr.P.C) to quash the proceedings in C.C No.3039 of 2021, pending on the file of the learned XI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad (herein after referred as “the trial Court”) against the petitioner-

accused.

2. Heard Mr. Pradyumna Kumar Reddy, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr.T.Anirudh Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Thomas Lloyd, learned counsel for respondent No.1 and Mr. E.Ganesh, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No.2 – State.

3. The brief facts of the case are that on 31.12.2020 at 15.00 hours the de-facto complainant-LW.1 lodged a complaint against the petitioner wherein she stated that her father Mr.Sidheswar Upadhyaya’s property and other assets are with her younger brother Sujith Kumar Upadhyaya, who is also known as SKU in the family. Further, the complainant stated that the inheritance property and company share which should have been given to the daughters is not given to her by her brother. Many discussions have taken place, but he did not give her share. On 26.11.2016 she se

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top